46
trial dispence with trial.
question by Jury.
3. That the Ordinance will, as ever, have effect in reference to offences committed within the waters situated within any the Limits of the Colony or within the Limits of the local jurisdiction of its Courts. And in executing within that Jurisdiction, we think there is no objection to the onus of proving circumstances being thrown on the accused persons under the circumstances described in Articles 5, 6, & 7 of section 1.
4. That it appears to us that the Nature of the population affected justifies the application of the punishments described in Article 7 of Section 1. This is rather a question (as indeed is the 3rd Question) of Policy than of Law.
We have the honor to be,
My Lord,
Your Lordship's most obedient,
Norman S. d'A. St. John,
H. Schuttelt,
E. H. Bevill
46
tion dispence with trial.
question by Jury.
3. That the Ordinance)
will as eve
in
-think he effecteral
reference to offences committed
upin
waters siticate within
any the Limite of the Colony
swithin
the Leniets of the local jurisdiction of its Courts. And in
excesating
within that Jurisdiction.
think there is
pnus
no
Loe
الي
objection to the
of proving churcence being
the
accused
throws on a recuerd persons inder
the circumstances described in
Articles 5. 6.4%. of section /
4. That it appears tous of the case and
that the Nature
5
the population affected justifies If the
the application of the punishments described in Article 7
Article % of Section
the this is rather a question
(as indeed is the 3rd Question]
of Poling than of Law
.
We have the honor tobe,
My
Lord
Your Lordship's next obcoun
Norn Si
Schuttelt
Mr Bevill
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.